AAIS FARMOWNERS PROGRAM: GL-90–INCIDENTAL BUSINESS PURSUITS
(October 2023)
This endorsement broadens Personal Liability Coverage to include business activities but only those described on the endorsement schedule.
The name(s) of the insured(s) who conduct the business, the description of the business itself, and the business’ estimated receipts are entered in the spaces provided. The schedule can accommodate up to five entries.
A checkmark in the appropriate space is required to indicate if coverage for products and completed work is to be included or excluded.
Notes:
Including coverage for products and completed work coverage increases the premium significantly.
The amount of estimated revenue the business generates is a strong indicator of whether the business is incidental or something more significant.
This endorsement extends the Personal Liability Coverage to the business activities described on the endorsement schedule conducted in conjunction with the insured premises.
Example: Sara
“Granny” Smith owns a large apple orchard, but she is really an ardent custom
doll maker. She made dolls as gifts for her children and grandchildren but now
sells the dolls at local craft shows under the name “Granny’s Darlings.” This
“hobby” generates about $7,000 in annual receipts. Sara’s cousin is also her
insurance agent. She tells Sara that she does not have coverage for any
damages that result from “Granny’s Darlings” unless she adds GL-90 to her
policy. |
As stated above, the named insured has the option to extend this endorsement’s coverage to include Products and Completed Work by placing a check mark in the appropriate space on the endorsement schedule.
Example: After processing the endorsement the next day, Sara contacts her again and advises that she decided she also wants the Products and Completed Work option. They are both very happy with that choice because Sara submits the following claims over the next two years: · A neighbor slips and falls in Sara’s workroom while placing a custom doll order. ·
A child, from a nearby town, chokes on a small
piece of a doll she swallowed after she tore the doll apart. |
Coverage does not apply to bodily injury or property damage that results from the following:
Example: Sara is a nurse. When her neighbor fell, she promptly
applied a special concoction she had developed to treat cuts and bruises. Her
neighbor claims that this medicinal compound caused severe irritation,
resulting in her injuries being more serious than if Sara had not done
anything. The insurance company denies any part of the claim related to
Sara’s professional services. |
|
Note: Of course, an insured may always challenge an insurance company’s interpretation of professional services.
Related Court Case: Product, Not Professional Services Exclusion, Bars Coverage
Note: This exclusion applies to either written or verbal contracts.
The following bodily injury or property damage is excluded when coverage for products and completed work is not selected:
Related Court Case: Completed Operations Hazard Exclusion Held Applicable to Electrical Shock Death from Use of Irrigation System
This endorsement defines products as goods or products the named insured or other parties that trade under its name manufacture, sell, handle, or distribute. Containers for the products are considered products, but vehicles are not. Vending machines or other property the named insured does not sell, but either rents to others or places for others to use are also not considered products.
Coverage is provided for persons named as “insureds.” This means that any person(s) connected to the business must be identified and disclosed. This controls the activity so that it does not go beyond the original intent.
Example: GL-90–Incidental Business Pursuits lists Marjorie as the insured and the business as Lawn Care. There is no coverage for this business pursuit if Marjorie gets tired of it and turns it over to her brother Patrick, even though they both live in the same household. |
GL-90 lets an insured list more than one business pursuit. As a result, questions may arise concerning the optional coverage for Products and Completed Work. The option to include this exposure appears to be on an “all or nothing” basis. If this endorsement includes more than one business activity, it seems to be appropriate to have the option to select Products and Completed Work coverage for each activity. It appears that this option to select or reject coverage for each business pursuit is unavailable, which may create ambiguity if or when a loss occurs. It is possible that an insured may either desire or assume that the option applies differently to each activity.
Considering the issues raised above with respect to insureds involved with business activities and the optional coverage for Products and Completed Work, it may be appropriate to suggest revising the endorsement wording to clarify the coverage intent.